Short remote consulting project in which a legal professional reviews written legal material and flags unsupported claims and missing context. Suits lawyers and legal researchers who give concise, well-supported feedback.
We’re seeking an experienced legal professional to support a short-term AI content evaluation project. You’ll use your legal judgment to assess written material, identify issues, and provide practical feedback that improves its quality.
What you’ll do
- Review legal content for accuracy, consistency, and appropriate context.
- Identify gaps in reasoning, ambiguous language, or conclusions that need further qualification.
- Assess whether explanations distinguish established legal principles from context-dependent interpretations.
- Document your findings clearly and suggest improvements.
- Document your findings clearly and suggest improvements.
- Professional experience in legal practice, in-house advisory, legal research, or a related legal role.
- Professional experience working with U.S., UK, Canadian, or another common-law legal system.
- Experience analyzing legal documents and translating complex issues into clear written guidance.
- Broad legal knowledge and comfort reviewing material outside a single narrow specialty.
- Sound judgment when identifying unsupported claims, missing context, or questions that require further research.
- Strong attention to detail and the ability to provide concise, well-supported feedback.
- Experience with legal editing, quality review, or work spanning multiple jurisdictions would be helpful.
About the engagement
This is a remote, short-term consulting project involving approximately 20-30 hours of work in total. Immediate availability is required.
Compensation
$80-$100/hour, depending on experience.
Listing from Braintrust's job board. Details can change; the platform's page is the final word.
